Salvemos Las Lomas Headline Animator

En defensa del patrimonio urbano de la ciudad

Las Lomas de Chapultepec es un fraccionamiento residencial diseñado y desarrollado en los años 20's, sobre las colinas ubicadas al poniente de la ciudad, bajo el concepto urbanistico suburbano americano de la epoca, respetando la orografia y los collados que permiten el drenaje natural y areas de absorcion del agua de lluvia; se le doto con parques, calles amplias y avenidas jardinadas, que siguen las curvas de nivel del terreno, lotes grandes y reglamentaciones para mantener la densidad de construccion baja con mucho jardin, casas abiertas con setos perimetrales bajos en lugar de bardas; se le dotó de varios centros de barrio para alojar comercios y servicios necesarios para los vecinos, a distancias caminables.
Al paso del tiempo, por sus cualidades humanas y urbanisticas intrinsecas, se convirtio en la mejor y mas prestigiada colonia residencial de la ciudad.
A partir de la regencia del Sr. Hank, y como consecuencia del cambio al uso del suelo en las 7 manzanas entre la Fuente de Petroleos y Prado Sur/Prado Norte, autorizado sin consultar a los vecinos y aprovechado por el mismo, inicia el deterioro y la destruccion de la colonia; se construyen edificios de oficinas, que trajeron poblacion flotante, muchos autos y con estos comercio informal y ambulante, los cuidacoches, invasion de las calles con autos estacionados durante todo el dia, y la saturacion del transporte publico.
Simultaneamente, en Bosques de las Lomas, cambian el uso de suelo a los lotes del circuito Ciruelos y Duraznos, autorizando edificios de oficina, con identicas consecuencias. La apertura del puente de Monte Libano a Tecamachalco primero, el de Cofre de Perote después y el llamado Puente Viejo, permitieron la invasion de la colonia por miles de autos de residentes en Tecamachalco, La Herradura, y mas recientemente Interlomas y los desarrollos inmobiliarios en esa zona del estado de Mexico, colonias desarrolladas sin planeacion urbana integral, sin dotarlas con vias de acceso independientes y perimetrales a Lomas de Chapultepec y Cuajimalpa. En el colmo de falta de planeacion, se desarrolla Santa Fe/Bosque de Lilas sin las vias de acceso necesarias, ni servicio de trasporte publico adecuado, y las calles de acceso, existentes desde hace años, no se arreglan para que opere un transporte publico de calidad y asi absorber parte del aforo vehicular que transita entre el sur poniente y Santa Fe/Lilas, sin ingresar a las Lomas, por tal motivo todos los automoviles atraidos a estos desarrollos son obligados a transitar por Paseo de la Reforma, Palmas y Virreyes, Constituyentes/Observatorio desde y hacia el Periferico, unica via para llevarlos al norte hacia Ciudad Satelite o al sur hacia San Jeronimo y Viaducto al oriente.
El problema tiene solución, pero ésta no es ampliar vialidades ni hacer obras que incentiven y faciliten la movilidad en automovil con 1 ocupante, sino en ofrecer transporte publico de calidad que transporta 200 personas por autobus y hacer que quien causa el congestionamiento, el automovilista, pague por ello, en beneficio de los mas.

sábado, 14 de julio de 2012 » Guangzhou’s ‘Hot’ Story: A Roadmap for Cities

For Release Sunday, July 8, 2012
© 2012 Washington Post Writers Group

Neal Peirce

GUANGZHOU, China — This is a “hot” world city — and more than by weather. From old “Canton,” a port and backwater of fish farms scattered across the Pearl River Delta, Guangzhou has transformed itself since the 1980s into a top global manufacturer.

At 15 million population, Guangzhou has more people than New York City. It’s building spectacular “sculptured” center city high rises (including the Canton Tower, briefly the world’s highest structure). It turns out an extraordinary array of goods for world markets, from T-shirts to automobiles, toys to petrochemicals. Current product lines run from batteries to the “designed in California” iPhones that dominate the global market for mobile devices.

Guangzhou and the delta are served by flashy new high-speed trains and high-class air service. And the city proper has implemented a “bus rapid transit” (BRT) system to move hundreds of thousands of passengers through its downtown, quickly and efficiently — a setup that’s arguably state of the art.

The need for high grade services is undeniable. In the last five years, the Guangzhou-Pearl River Delta economy has doubled in size. In 2003 it passed Hong Kong, the original wonder Asian factory for the world. In 2007 its economy passed that of Taiwan. It is now half that of all of Korea.

On the economic side, there’s been a serious price to pay for all the breakneck speed of development: horrendous roadway congestion and seriously polluted air.

And there’s a human cost, reminiscent of the early days of the Industrial Revolution in Britain and America. Thousands of workers, many imported from distant rural Chinese towns to work in regimented private-sector owned factories, find themselves living under grim working conditions. I was shocked to hear one first-generation factory worker describe his working year: 364 days, only New Year’s as a holiday.

For outsiders, it’s hard to figure how long it will be before a worker rebellion — or perhaps negative publicity — will undercut the deep exploitation. It’s true that the region’s long-range goal is higher-value (and less polluting) manufacturing — as Japan and Korea, and Hong Kong, have achieved. But the economic incentive for lowest-cost manufacturing is tough to break.

And learning can occur, as the bus rapid transit system shows. On an early (1979) trip of American planners to China, I heard Chinese officials being urged to save the country’s bike culture, and foster public transportation, because the nation’s vast millions in private cars would be a disaster. China, of course, didn’t listen, discouraging bikes and pouring money into roadways. The net result: hideous gridlock and immense roadway demand (Beijing, famously, now has six ring roads). Belatedly, public investment has begun to shift to high-speed rail and city subway systems — of which China now plans literally dozens more.

In Guangzhou, Zhongshan Avenue — a key artery through the city and one of the world’s busiest bus corridors — was a special nightmare of buses, cars, trucks jockeying for space, the whole moving tortuously slowly. So the U.S.-based Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) approached the mayor and suggested reconstructing the center of Zhongshan Avenue for buses only. Regular traffic would be relegated to the sides (still three lanes each way).

Guangzhou’s mayor, justifiably suspicious, became convinced after ITDP took him to Sao Paulo to see a BRT system in efficient operation. Soon afterward, construction began on Zhongshan Avenue. Hell quickly broke loose, however, as riders endured heavy rains and baking heat because shelters were temporarily removed. Local media called it a terrible boondoggle.

Yet the mayor was adamant, construction went forward, and the new BRT lanes opened — one each way and, importantly, including an extra pullover lane in each direction at the designated station stops. The result: no buses delayed by others loading or unloading passengers. In fact, passengers pay their fares to enter the stations and then know, by number and destination, precisely where to stand for the next bus as it swoops into its designated pullover location.

Net result, says Karl Fjellstrom, ITDP’s man on the scene: some 850,000 BRT passengers each day. The buses continue, at the end of their 14-mile exclusive right-of-way, into neighborhoods for passengers’ convenience (and fewer transfers).

Overall traffic congestion has been dramatically reduced, with each Guangzhou BRT station handling as many as 300 buses an hour. Rental bicycles are located at the key city stops. The bus stations have roofs so passengers don’t need to wait in the rain.

Fjellstrom believes BRT systems — which can be built at a fraction of the cost, at a fraction of the time — easily trump the case for subways. One doesn’t need to buy that argument completely to agree that from now on, in China, the U.S. and elsewhere, BRT systems shouldn’t be seen as outlyers but one significant way to resolve cities’ 21st century transportation crises.

Neal Peirce’s e-mail is

For reprints of Neal Peirce’s column, please contact Washington Post Permissions, c/o PARS International Corp.,, fax 212-221-9195. For newspaper syndication sales, Washington Post Writers Group, 202-334-5375,

Interesante articulo que describe el frenetico desarrollo de la ciudad Guangzhou, su economia crecio 100% en 5 años. Ha invertido grandes cantidades en transporte publico, pero cuando el parque vehicular aumenta en 500 autos por dia, los congestionamientos son monumentales y nunca podran ser mitigados de no cambiar las prioridades urbanas que favorecen al automovil.

No hay comentarios: