Salvemos Las Lomas: PT's Parking Blog: Charge Me to Park in Front of My House

En defensa del patrimonio urbano de la ciudad

Las Lomas de Chapultepec es un fraccionamiento residencial diseñado y desarrollado en los años 20's, sobre las colinas ubicadas al poniente de la ciudad, bajo el concepto urbanistico suburbano americano de la epoca, respetando la orografia y los collados que permiten el drenaje natural y areas de absorcion del agua de lluvia; se le doto con parques, calles amplias y avenidas jardinadas, que siguen las curvas de nivel del terreno, lotes grandes y reglamentaciones para mantener la densidad de construccion baja con mucho jardin, casas abiertas con setos perimetrales bajos en lugar de bardas; se le dotó de varios centros de barrio para alojar comercios y servicios necesarios para los vecinos, a distancias caminables.
Al paso del tiempo, por sus cualidades humanas y urbanisticas intrinsecas, se convirtio en la mejor y mas prestigiada colonia residencial de la ciudad.
A partir de la regencia del Sr. Hank, y como consecuencia del cambio al uso del suelo en las 7 manzanas entre la Fuente de Petroleos y Prado Sur/Prado Norte, autorizado sin consultar a los vecinos y aprovechado por el mismo, inicia el deterioro y la destruccion de la colonia; se construyen edificios de oficinas, que trajeron poblacion flotante, muchos autos y con estos comercio informal y ambulante, los cuidacoches, invasion de las calles con autos estacionados durante todo el dia, y la saturacion del transporte publico.
Simultaneamente, en Bosques de las Lomas, cambian el uso de suelo a los lotes del circuito Ciruelos y Duraznos, autorizando edificios de oficina, con identicas consecuencias. La apertura del puente de Monte Libano a Tecamachalco primero, el de Cofre de Perote después y el llamado Puente Viejo, permitieron la invasion de la colonia por miles de autos de residentes en Tecamachalco, La Herradura, y mas recientemente Interlomas y los desarrollos inmobiliarios en esa zona del estado de Mexico, colonias desarrolladas sin planeacion urbana integral, sin dotarlas con vias de acceso independientes y perimetrales a Lomas de Chapultepec y Cuajimalpa. En el colmo de falta de planeacion, se desarrolla Santa Fe/Bosque de Lilas sin las vias de acceso necesarias, ni servicio de trasporte publico adecuado, y las calles de acceso, existentes desde hace años, no se arreglan para que opere un transporte publico de calidad y asi absorber parte del aforo vehicular que transita entre el sur poniente y Santa Fe/Lilas, sin ingresar a las Lomas, por tal motivo todos los automoviles atraidos a estos desarrollos son obligados a transitar por Paseo de la Reforma, Palmas y Virreyes, Constituyentes/Observatorio desde y hacia el Periferico, unica via para llevarlos al norte hacia Ciudad Satelite o al sur hacia San Jeronimo y Viaducto al oriente.
El problema tiene solución, pero ésta no es ampliar vialidades ni hacer obras que incentiven y faciliten la movilidad en automovil con 1 ocupante, sino en ofrecer transporte publico de calidad que transporta 200 personas por autobus y hacer que quien causa el congestionamiento, el automovilista, pague por ello, en beneficio de los mas.

martes, 14 de junio de 2011

PT's Parking Blog: Charge Me to Park in Front of My House

« Credit Card Readers in Missoula | Main | “Enterprise” Solutions, Cloud Computing, and Off Street Parking Management and Mickey Mouse »

June 13, 2011

Charge Me to Park in Front of My House

Why not? The folks over on our Facebook Page are talking about this concept and seem to be in favor. They are talking about urging folks to clean out their garages and park their cars there. I'm all for that, but I have other reasons.
First – let's get the cars off the streets. It's simple. The rule could be that you could park for two hours (or four) and then you had to pay. A classic first two hour free rate. Most short term visitors would be able to park in the neighborhood without paying, residents would have to use their garages. This would take the vast majority of cars off the street.
Second – People need to be thinking that parking space costs money. This program would get drivers understanding that parking has value. It is not the responsibility of the taxpayers to provide parking space for people who elect to own and drive cars. Parking is another expense in driving – fuel, insurance, oil, tires, maintenance, and parking.
Third – Security. The process of enforcement would have more people in uniforms and marked cars driving around the neighborhood. They could call the cops if a problem was spotted. What's wrong with having an extra pair of eyes on the lookout for creepy guys walking around (ignore the two geezers with the sheltie and two Chihuahuas, they live here.)
Fourth – Revenue. The money from the permits and fines could be used to keep the street lights lit, the sidewalks and streets in good repair, the trees in the parkway trimmed. Gee who wouldn't want to charge for parking if the money actually went right back in to filling those potholes and cleaning up the weeds that are peeking out through the crumbling curbs.
Fifth – it's just good public policy. We are managing an asset and keeping the public trust.
How it might work: Residents could purchase one time permits, say in groups of 10. How about $5 each. You could order them on line, or at the local fire station or even at the 711 or Bodega on the corner. When someone comes and they are going to stay more than a couple of hours, you put today's date on the permit and they put it on their dash. It is only good for that day. If a resident elected to park their car on the street, they could purchase a permit for full time use. Maybe $75 a month – or whatever. We got $75 a month from half of the 300 cars that park on the street overnight in my neighborhood, (about six square blocks) that would net out $135K a year (not counting the daily permits) – spread that out over an entire city and guess what money it would bring. And that doesn't even count citation revenue.
Enforcement would drive around and check the permits. Citations would be issued as appropriate. Simple, elegant, no worries. All money is collected on line or when permits are purchased. No issue with machines, maintenance, collecting coins, etc.
The money would go to administer the program and what was left over would be used for services in the neighborhood.
OK, you libertarians, come at me.
JVH

Posted by JVH on June 13, 2011 at 11:25 AM | Permalink

Comments

This obviously comes from someone that does NOT live in a large metropolitan City like Chicago. Your asking residents to pay for parking in front of their house. Which again comes from someone that obviously has additional cash flow [that yes makes owning a vehicle nuts]and advocating that a system of this nature (in Chicago no less) would run smoothly.

Let's say for conversation sake, the City would be in favor of this,(Parking Meters come to mind), now your saying the revenue (which all gov't agencies are in favor of) would actually trickel down to the right places? I won't even go into the "policing" action, no-one pays the parking tickets now.

Now if we "fine tune" the idea just a bit, what if a group of home-owners got a fare stake in letting the spot in front be sold?

Posted by: John Feeney | June 13, 2011 at 12:30 PM

Actually I love the idea that homeowners would get a reduction on their property taxes. But you are right, no city government would allow the money to get away. As for cash flow, the person can afford 25K for the car, 2k for insurance, $75 a go to fill up, 1k for maintenance, $250 a year for tires, but can't afford to pay to park it. Sorry John, doesn't compute.
JVH

Posted by: JVH | June 13, 2011 at 02:53 PM

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

Posted by: |

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:

Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

<div id="comments-open-noscript" class="comments-open-noscript"> <form action="http://parkingtoday.typepad.com/.services/comments" method="post"> <input type="hidden" name="entry_xid" id="comment-entry-xid" value="6a00d83451a42c69e2015432fd3bf5970c" /> <input type="hidden" name="token" value="1308064119-1a2a9e752eeb0f5f7e29491abb6b61d1363717d5:NjA2WUmOqaFnKmdE" /> Name:<br /><input type="text" name="author" size="30" /><br /> Email address:<br /><input type="text" name="email" size="30" /><br /> URL:<br /><input type="text" name="url" size="30" /><br /><br /> Comment:<br /><textarea name="text" cols="40" rows="4"></textarea><br /> <input type="submit" name="submit" value="Submit" /> </form> </div>